The Mitford Murders ~ Jessica Fellowes

70757~Cafe-Mocha-PostersI don’t usually have any truck with crime fiction that is built around real people and especially not those featuring individuals only relatively recently deceased. For example, I gave up on the Nicola Upton books after the first one even though many of my blogging friends really enjoy them. They leave me feeling uneasy, especially when some of the characters concerned are throughly maligned.  However, Jessica Fellowes’ The Mitford Murders was so highly praised by a reviewer who has introduced me to some very fine writers in the past that I decided I would give it the benefit of the doubt and see what it was like.  I should learn to trust my own judgement.

As you might gather from the title, the story is based around the Mitford family and I understand that the idea is to write six books each featuring a different daughter in a leading role, starting here with Nancy. It is 1919 and a retired nurse with years of wartime service behind her is killed on a train as she travels from London down to the south coast. The trail very soon goes cold and Guy Sullivan, an officer with the London, Brighton and South Coast Railway Police is ordered by his Superintendent to let the matter lie.  Guy, however, motivated both by a desire for justice and his ambition to join the Met, is reluctant to do so, especially as pursuing the case gives him a reason to continue contact with one Louisa Cannon, also caught up in the case.

Louisa has her own reasons for also wanting to let the matter lie.  Her life in London has become unbearable and a chance meeting with an old friend provides her with an opportunity to take up a post as nursery maid with the Mitford family at their home in Asthall Manor.  Louisa is well aware that bringing a murder investigation into the heart of Lord and Lady Redesdale’s family is not going to be acceptable.  Unfortunately, once Nancy, sixteen and desperate to move out of the nursery and into the adult world of parties and general bon viveur, finds out about the case Louisa has little option, especially when it begins to appear that a young man who has taken Nancy’s eye may well be involved.

I really wanted to like this book but I was left disappointed on so many levels.  The writing is poor, the plotting so weak that it is clear that one individual is involved in the murder even before it has been committed, and very few of the characters rise above the level of stereotype.  I can’t help feeling that the series has been conceived simply to take advantage of the interest in such programmes as Downton Abbey and in the Mitford family themselves.  Nothing wrong in that if there was anything of substance here but when I compare this to say, Jacqueline Winspear’s Maisie Dobbs novels, which are set in a similar period, there is simply no comparison.  Not only do Winspear’s characters have substance, but she is genuinely concerned to explore the social conditions that Londoners and those who had fought in the First World War had to endure in the 1920s and 30s.  Here these are simply side issues introduced to provide the occasional red herring along the way.

The story is based on an actual unsolved murder and names have not been changed: that includes the name of the innocent person that Fellows here designates as murderer and I have to say that that left me very uneasy indeed.  In fact the whole enterprise just seems tasteless and as it doesn’t even have the merit of being well plotted or well written I find myself wondering what the point was other than to cash in on the popularity of the Mitfords and Downton Abbey. With so much else just lining up waiting to be read I won’t be going back for anymore of these, even though I must admit to being curious as to how Fellowes is going to handle tales of the grown up Diana and Unity.

16 thoughts on “The Mitford Murders ~ Jessica Fellowes

  1. A Life in Books November 8, 2017 / 8:32 am

    Funny you should mention Downton Abbey: Jessica Fellowes is the niece of Julian Fellowes who wrote the DT scripts. I suspect you’re right.


    • Café Society November 8, 2017 / 5:11 pm

      I didn’t watch Downton Abbey, but I had come across the name Fellowes in relation to it and I did wonder if there was a link.

      Liked by 1 person

      • A Life in Books November 8, 2017 / 5:41 pm

        Me, neither. I’ve never understood the appeal of that kind of drama.


  2. Harriet Devine November 8, 2017 / 8:57 am

    Interesting. I too tend to avoid the combination of crime fiction and real people, but unlike you I really enjoy Nicola Upson’s books. I had heard of this and wasn’t really tempted – now I’m afraid I will definitely be giving it a miss.


    • Café Society November 8, 2017 / 5:13 pm

      Well, you a better reason than most to appreciate Nicola Upson’s books. What surprised me was just how positively this book has been reviewed in the press. I don’t take their views as gospel, but I don’t often disagree as strongly as I have done over this


  3. kaggsysbookishramblings November 8, 2017 / 11:34 am

    I really don’t like the idea of this at all. I was the same with the Upson books which I didn’t like either, especially as Tey was not her real name – so was the book about a non-existence author or a figment? There’s an increasing trend of fictionalised real people and it just makes me uneasy. I also think it’s a weeny bit lazy….


    • Café Society November 8, 2017 / 5:15 pm

      I certainly think it’s lazy in terms of establishing an audience. A lot of people will read this because of the Mitford name, regardless of the quality of the writing.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Margaret November 8, 2017 / 12:23 pm

    I gave up on Nicola Upson’s books too. I’m not tempted by this book, although like you I think it’d be interesting to see what the author does with Diana and Unity. It’s also reminded me I still haven’t got round to reading The Mitfords: Letters between Six Sisters, which I bought in 2008!!!


    • Café Society November 8, 2017 / 5:16 pm

      At least you can remember when you bought it! My copy is sitting unread on the shelf as well and I have no idea how long it has been there!


  5. buriedinprint November 8, 2017 / 4:39 pm

    How disappointing for you. I loathe that feeling of having been tricked into reading/viewing something because of a hook that was consciously placed there for my interest to catch upon!


    • Café Society November 8, 2017 / 5:18 pm

      To be fair I wouldn’t have read this just because of the hook. It was simply because it had been so well reviewed and I’m always on the look out for new crime series. However, I do agree with you about the dubious moral nature of a feature set up to draw in the reader.


  6. Kat November 8, 2017 / 7:15 pm

    Oh my goodness! I would say I have to read a Mitford mystery, except I would agree with you about the style. I had to give up a long time ago on Jane Austen mysteries, etc., because they’re just so unlike Austen. I’ve yet to read Maisie Dobbs, but even Hillary Clinton recommends those, so I will give them a look.


    • Café Society November 8, 2017 / 9:12 pm

      What makes the Maisie Dobbs books stand out for me is the way in which Winspear uses her stories to examine the really dreadful conditions faced by those who came back from the First World War. For so many ordinary people those interwar years were terrible, especially those who had fought. It’s an aspect that develops over the series.


  7. FictionFan November 8, 2017 / 10:22 pm

    I have reservations too about including real people unless the author sticks fairly rigidly to the known facts – for example, I quite enjoyed learning about Hilda Matheson of the early BBC in Radio Girls, although even then I came out of it feeling I’d have preferred to read a proper biography instead. But to make a real person the murderer seems to be beyond tasteless – I do hope the person doesn’t have surviving relatives. I’m not sure I like the law that allows us to say anything we like about dead people, especially those within the last century or so…


    • Café Society November 10, 2017 / 8:37 am

      I was very uneasy about the first Upton. No one was named, but anyone with any knowledge of the theatre in that period must have been very suspicious as to where the finger was pointing.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s